Wednesday, August 6, 2014

Weber and the Idea of Capitalism - Allan de Bottom

Born in Erfurt in Germany in 1864, Weber grew up to see his country convulsed by the dramatic changes ushered in by the Industrial Revolution in a time that a new managerial elite was replacing the old aristocracy.

His wife, Marianne, turned out to be unhelpfully similar to his mother.Weber’s path to intellectual recovery began after he had a liberating affair with a sexually-progressive 19-year-old student.
Capitalism might feel normal or inevitable to us but, of course, it isn’t. It came into existence only relatively recently, in historical terms, and has successfully taken root in just a limited number of countries.

Protestantism makes you feel guilty all the time. Capitalism was created by Protestantism, specifically Calvinism, as developed by John Calvin in Geneva and by his followers in England, the Puritans.God is thought able to forgive and He won’t make his intentions known until the Day of Judgement.

All work is holy, god likes hard work.Protestant guilt feelings were diverted into an obsession with hard work.God didn’t like time off. Money earnt wasn’t to be blown in feasts celebrating the here-and-now.It was always and only to be reinvested for tomorrow.

Work of any kind could and should be done in the name of God, even jobs like being a baker or an accountant. Work was no longer just about earning a living, it was to be part of a religious vocation connected with proving one’s virtue to God

It’s the community, not the family, that counts. One was meant to direct one’s selfless energies to the community as a whole, the public realm where everyone deserved fairness and dignity.Protestantism turned its back on miracles. God wasn’t thought to be lever-pulling behind the scenes day-to-day - ‘the disenchantment of the world.Protestant philosophy, the emphasis fell on human action

Marx had argued that religion was ‘the opium of the masses’, a drug that induced passive acceptance of the horrors of Capitalism.Marx had proposed a materialist view of Capitalism (where technology was said to have created a new capitalist social system), whereas Weber now advanced an idealist one (suggesting that it was in fact a set of ideas that had created Capitalism and given the impetus for its newfound technological and financial arrangements).

People didn’t tolerate Capitalism because of religion, they only became capitalists as a result of their religion. There are about 35 countries where Capitalism is now well developed. Weberian analysis tells us that these materialist interventions will never work, because the problem isn’t really a material one to begin with. One has to start at the level of ideas.

Certain countries fail to succeed at Capitalism because they don’t feel anxious and guilty enough.They like to celebrate now rather than reinvest for tomorrow and their members feel it’s acceptable to steal from the community in order to enrich their families, favouring the clan over the nation. Protestantism had merely brought to their first fruition ideas which could now subsist outside of religious ideology
Capitalism to concentrate on our equivalent of religion: culture. The path to reforming an economy shouldn’t hence wind through material aid, it should go through cultural assistance. The decisive question for an economy is not what the rate of inflation is, but what is on TV tonight.

We will need to look to changing mentalities, instilling something akin to an updated version of the attitudes of Calvinism.They believe in clans, they have magical thinking, they don’t believe that God would Himself command them to be an honest mechanic or hairdresser…

The belief in samsara – the transmigration of souls – also inspires the view that nothing substantial can change until the next life. At the same time, a Hindu ideology of the clan takes pressure off individual responsibility and encourages nepotism rather than meritocracy.

There Confucianism gives too much weight to tradition. No one feels able to rethink how things are done. The devotion to bureaucracy encourages a static society

Three distinct types of power across its history

1.       ‘traditional authority.deeply inert and only rarely allowed for initiative
2.       ‘charismatic authority’change everything around him through passion and will
3.       bureaucratic authority The only way to overcome the power lodged within bureaucracy is through knowledge and systematic organisation.
He tells us how power works now and reminds us that ideas may be far more important than tools or money in changing nations.

We associate with vast impersonal external forces,in fact, dependent upon something utterly intimate and perhaps more malleable: the thoughts in our own heads

No comments:

Post a Comment